質問
We have got some advice that it is useful to use popular brands to illustrate your business model.
For that I have even found a couple of examples of successfully funded startups on Angel.co - such as "Viddy - Instagram for videos" or "Pinshape - iTunes for 3D Printing". Why don't these startups infringe trademark rights by using instagram and iTunes for their own purposes?
Here are the examples I mentioned:
https://angel.co/pinshape
https://angel.co/viddy
回答: 2 公開 & 0 非公開
Be aware that the reproduction of a trademark, even if it is a slavish ("verbatim") reproduction of a well-known brand, will constitute an infringement - legally speaking - only if the trademark that is so reproduced is intended for commercial use, regardless of the law to be applied.
If these start-ups simply illustrate their business model by simply referring to the popular brands without using them to offer for sale and sell identical and/or similar products or services designated by the said trademarks, they cannot be prosecuted for infringement.
However, one can imagine that other grievances may be objected as misleading advertising, damage to the image (eg the use of a car brand by gangsters in a video ...) or parasitism in some cases, but this is another topic...
最近の質問
I sometimes see questions on forums like Quora about how to stop people stealing your invention i...
4 5386 2I am looking for useful sources on protecting copyright. I am in the process of writing a book ba...
3 6115 2What is the current wisdom on compiling news feeds on a third party website so far as copyright i...
1 3962 0This might be a silly question but I’m a bit confused by ‘prior disclosure’ as it applies to pate...
2 4823 1