質問
I have built an enhancement to an existing device. I would like to patent it, but I feel it it may fail the obviousness clause when applying for a patent. This is the best analogy I can think of: Can I potentially patent a box shape when applied to the head of a rocket? In this example, the box shape has specific advantages (over other shapes of rocket heads) and no patents for box-shaped-rocket-heads exist (in this example, no one has thought of it).
回答: 2 公開 & 0 非公開
If you can effectively claim the advantages of the box shape you may have a good chance of overcoming the obviousness hurdle. Ensure that in your specification that you discuss conventional rocket heads, what they do, what they don't do, why it would be better if the rocket head had a box shape, then fully discuss the box-shaped head in your detailed description of the specification, and then claim it. The examiner will probably issue an obviousness rejection but with your arguments, supported by your specification, you should be able to overcome the rejection.
Steve gave the prefect answer, agreed.
最近の質問
I sometimes see questions on forums like Quora about how to stop people stealing your invention i...
4 5386 2I am looking for useful sources on protecting copyright. I am in the process of writing a book ba...
3 6115 2What is the current wisdom on compiling news feeds on a third party website so far as copyright i...
1 3962 0This might be a silly question but I’m a bit confused by ‘prior disclosure’ as it applies to pate...
2 4823 1