質問
We want to register a name for our startup and use a similar name to our competitor. What is the legal issues with this strategy? For example, say it's a business for hotels and guest houses (only example, our product is other). And we call it "flairBnB" and register flairBnB.com. On one hand we get many visitors and customers would recognize the name. So we can piggyback of the competitor's name. But this is the same business so would the competitor be successful for trademark lawsuit? What is the legal issues with this strategy? What strategy would you advise?
回答: 3 公開 & 0 非公開
I can't advise you as to Hong Kong law but in the US, you would open yourself up to an opposition to your proposed registration from your direct competitor with the possibility of your mark being denied registration protection. The standard is "likelihood of confusion." A lot will depend on how vigilant/aggressive your competitor is about policing their IP. Factors that might mitigate against the likehood of confusion would be if the presentation of your logo (e.g., colors, font, design, trade dress if any, look and feel of your website) was very dissimilar from your competitor's.
In addition to what my colleagues said, based upon your fact pattern you could also be liable for WILLFUL trademark infringement which carries a far more severe penalty - treble damages or 3x the amount of actual damages determined by the court - not to mention a possible award to the plaintiff for their attorneys fees in bringing the lawsuit against you. What you are describing is precisely what is outlawed in trademark law and if you get caught, you could face serious consequences that will make you really regret "piggybacking on your competitor's name."
最近の質問
I sometimes see questions on forums like Quora about how to stop people stealing your invention i...
4 5386 2I am looking for useful sources on protecting copyright. I am in the process of writing a book ba...
3 6115 2What is the current wisdom on compiling news feeds on a third party website so far as copyright i...
1 3962 0This might be a silly question but I’m a bit confused by ‘prior disclosure’ as it applies to pate...
2 4823 1