質問
We are discussing the shareholder agreement for our technology startup. At this point, there are no external shareholders so only co-founders are supposed to have equity in the company. A problem of the agreement seems to be a case where – for whatever reason – a shareholder is not able/willing to continue working on the project. One person says that a shareholder should not lose their share in the company ever, the others say the non-continuing co-founder should either return their equity or at least have it reduced. What is the usual way to do this in a shareholder agreement?
回答: 1 公開 & 0 非公開
While you may have a difficult time wresting or otherwise compromising a shareholder's capital contributions (or equity directly tied thereto), a manageable way to hedge against the risk of an uncooperative co-founder is to tie vesting of a substantial portion of his equity to performance, e.g., via a Management Equity Agreement ("MEA") that is periodically reviewed by the founders. An uncooperative founder, responsible under the MEA for some level of contribution or time spent, can be found in breach and thus forfeit subsequent equity from vesting. Schedules and other terms by which vesting would occur will need to be negotiated, of course, and even if the facts of your particular situation warrant another framework, it is very advisable to contact local corporate counsel to explore specific paths forward.
最近の質問
I sometimes see questions on forums like Quora about how to stop people stealing your invention i...
4 5386 2I am looking for useful sources on protecting copyright. I am in the process of writing a book ba...
3 6115 2What is the current wisdom on compiling news feeds on a third party website so far as copyright i...
1 3962 0This might be a silly question but I’m a bit confused by ‘prior disclosure’ as it applies to pate...
2 4823 1