Is interpretation of known historical facts protectable under copyright law?

Question

I am looking for useful sources on protecting copyright. I am in the process of writing a book based on my own new and independent interpretation of known historical facts. Is the interpretation part protected under copyright law? And can anyone recommend any good resources for understanding this aspect of copyright law? Thank you in advance for your help.

Answers: 3 public & 0 private

Steven weinrieb
Patent Attorney

Copyright law is relatively simple to understand - you simply cannot COPY someone else's work. And yes, your own work is then copyrightable. Your work can effectively be the same as someone else's work - as long as you didn't actually copy it. So, for example, let's say you did research on WW II, analyzed all of the major battles by all of the major players - Germany attacks Poland, Germany takes over and occupies France, Germany then turns its attention to the Soviet Union, whatever - you can write your own analysis as you see it, as you have interpreted it, reach your own conclusions as to why the Allies won the war and why Germany lost the war - as long you do not COPY anything from anyone else. That is basic copyright law.

Lawrence lau
IP Broker

Copyright protects the expression and creativity, but not facts. Interpretation as you put it is rather nebulous ... you can protect the book per se in that you can control the electronic rights, but if you want to be associated with the interpretation, or be considered the thought-leader on the subject, then that is starting to edge into publicity rights or perhaps even personal brand

E048c46da8
Lawyer

Copyright protects the expression of ideas, not the ideas in themselves or historical facts per se. As pertains to the latter, what copyright will protect is prior accounts or interpretation of these historical facts fixed in any tangible form, whether in words, songs or other expressions of art. As long as you do not include these prior works belonging to other people in your own work without the permission of the owner first sought and received, I don't think you should have any problem pertaining to copyright. Just about any material on copyright or copyright law will shed more light on this.
I also feel the need to point out that proper acknowledgement of the source or ownership of the information (where decipherable) is very essential. Depending on the historical fact you are writing on, that knowledge or information may be unique to a particular group of people forming a part of their history, therefore a full, proper acknowledgement will be required in a case such as that.
I hope you (or anyone else) find(s) this helpful!

Recent questions

Do people really steal invention ideas?

I sometimes see questions on forums like Quora about how to stop people stealing your invention i...

4 3303 2
Is interpretation of known historical facts protectable under copyright law?

I am looking for useful sources on protecting copyright. I am in the process of writing a book ba...

3 3343 2
Fair Use and news feeds

What is the current wisdom on compiling news feeds on a third party website so far as copyright i...

1 2248 0
Looking for good patent firm

How to find a good patent firm to help me apply patent in USA

3 2587 2
What constitutes 'prior disclosure'?

This might be a silly question but I’m a bit confused by ‘prior disclosure’ as it applies to pate...

2 2838 1

Do you have a question about your invention or intellectual property?
Search the questions below or post your enquiry to one of our experts via Directory.
(User questions are no longer posted publicly on this page.)