What are the merits of filing a patent before the end of the grace period?


I was told that for some patents you have a 1-year grace period before filing them. What would be the reason then to file for a patent before it is necessary? Is the 'patent pending' notice a significant benefit or does the filing create an asset?

回答: 3 公開 & 0 非公開


BY grace period refer here is provisional application which generally files before complete application, the idea of provisional application is to allowed protection to true inventor on first to file basis, also in many cases we have seen the product prototype is ready but it required more testing and additional resources, sometimes fund, discussion, so during all these process inventors doesn't loose it right of true inventor, it also help inventor to seek additional time to develop the proposed patentable product I n all respects and file complete applications.

So you can say early filing gives you legal protection on your invention but nothing else, it's not assets till then it's been granted a patent and registered with IPO office.


In the U.S., you are “patent pending” once you file an application, provisional or otherwise, and any filed application is an asset that may be transacted. The sooner an application is filed, the earlier the priority date (generally) and the smaller the universe of prior art which might be asserted against your non-provisional application would be. The one year “grace period” to which you are referring is a window in which the USPTO will allow you to disclose your invention, subject to certain conditions, without such disclosure itself become a prior art reference that would be found to preempt your invention once its non-provisional application is examined. The “grace period” does not directly have anything to do with others and their inventions / applications. The “grace period” is NOT some window in which you can refrain from filing an application and still hope to preempt others who might file applications for similar technology - since the American Invents Act was effective, the U.S. patent system is a “first to file” system and filing an application is what creates priority. From the nature of your question, you would likely receive significant benefit from speaking with patent counsel in private to craft a IP strategy.

Steven weinrieb

The one yer grace period is only allotted in connection with the filing of US patent applications after the invention has been publicly disclosed - if you do not file your US patent application within the one-year period, you will then be statutorily barred from filing a US patent application. The reason for filing as soon as possible is that the US is now, since the AIA went into effect, a first-to-file country, so whoever files a patent application first for a particular invention is automatically the senior inventor. Therefore, let's assume you publicly disclosed your invention on January 1, 2017 - the one year grace period permits you to file a patent application by January 1, 2018, and let's say that you do not file your application until November 1, 2017, still well within the one year grace period. However, since you publicly disclosed it on January 1, 2917, another party files a patent application on June 1, 2017, five months before you file your application on November 1, 2017. They are then automatically the senior party and their patent application will be prior art against your patent application and you will be denied a patent because the other party has already obtained, or is in the process of obtaining, a patent for the same invention. As noted, this is only for US patents - your public disclosure has already prevented you from obtaining any foreign patents. As for patent pending, such a notice gives the world notice that you have a patent application pending which could result in the grant of a patent - therefore, they are on notice that they may be infringing a US patent if the patent in fact issues. Once you have filed a patent application, you have the right to use "patent pending" and it is an asset because if it in fact results in a patent being granted, patent rights are property, patent rights are assets.

One other note - one of the other panel members referred to the one-year period that one has after the filing of a provisional patent application, however, I do not believe that that one-year period is ever referred to as a "grace period" - it is a mandated time frame in which you must effectively convert a provisional patent application into a non-provisional patent application or a PCT application, and unlike the first grace period discussed hereinbefore, you do not lose any rights if you wait the entire one year period. To the contrary, your rights are preserved as of the filing date of the provisional application. In addition, by filing the provisional patent application prior to any public disclosure, you can in fact pursue foreign patents through PCT.


Do people really steal invention ideas?

I sometimes see questions on forums like Quora about how to stop people stealing your invention i...

4 3351 2
Is interpretation of known historical facts protectable under copyright law?

I am looking for useful sources on protecting copyright. I am in the process of writing a book ba...

3 3402 2
Fair Use and news feeds

What is the current wisdom on compiling news feeds on a third party website so far as copyright i...

1 2293 0
Looking for good patent firm

How to find a good patent firm to help me apply patent in USA

3 2640 2
What constitutes 'prior disclosure'?

This might be a silly question but I’m a bit confused by ‘prior disclosure’ as it applies to pate...

2 2884 1