Why do people say that convertible debt financing is cheaper and/or quicker?

Question

Is this true, and if so, why? Can financing a startup with convertible already make sense at the seed stage? Why would a startup not use debt financing/loans then? What is the strategy then if we want to raise money from angels with convertible debt instead of equity?

or

Answers: 1 public & 0 private

Lawrence lau
IP Broker

The biggest sticking point in any private investment tends to be valuation and share % ownership. With convertible debt, the valuation is kicked down the road to a priced round. The problem with debt is that it ranks higher than shareholders and so is not true risk-sharing, especially if directors/founders are asked for personal guarantee. There are some that argue that uncapped convertible debt doesn't align the interest of investors and founders (see http://techcrunch.com/2012/09/05/why-convertible-notes-are-sometimes-terrible-for-startups/) . Hence seed financing have standardised on financing for future equity documents. As for the choice for angels, follow the golden rule ... he who has the gold makes the rules.

Recent questions