Question
Provisional patents are not "examined"; however, are there cases where the disclosure of a provisional patent is relied upon to assess the validity of a non-provisional patent claiming it as priority? What if the non-provisional patent claims more than what is disclosed in the provisional patent - is the non-provisional patent entirely invalid?
Answers: 2 public & 0 private
Hi,
A provisional locks in priority date for what it discloses providing that it has 35 USC 112 support (except for best mode). Over the years, I've had to go into the provisional even during prosecution, and yes; court cases especially go into them. Attacking the priority date, allows for more prior art to come in against the patent.
When you file the non-provisional with new matter not covered in the provisional, all that happens is the new matter is given the priority date of the filing date of the non-provisional filing. In other words you won't get the benefit of the provisional filing date for the new matter. The non-provisional isn’t invalidated.
Please keep in mind that foreign countries, like Europe, have stricter requirements for provisional support than the US. Given all this, if you file a provisional and need to rely on the priority date, then it has to be written well - almost as good as a non-provisional.
Hope this helps,
Mary
Recent questions
I am looking for ...
3 6115 2