質問
Hi there! If we succeed in getting a patent for our technology, do we have a universal right to exploit the patented technology? Or could we still be liable to other patent-holders due to infringement?
回答: 4 公開 & 0 非公開
No, your patent does not give you the right automatically to practice your own invention - and you certainly do not have the right universally - patents are territorial - each country or group of countries controls the patent rights. The patent gives you the exclusive right to prevent others from making, using, or selling your patented invention but does not give you that right because if you choose to use your patented technology, you may possibly infringe other patents.
First, I've seen many people think they got a patent when all they'd done was file or provisional or while their utility was under examination.
Second, "universal" is a broad word. No, you can only practice the patent with protection (subject to constraints stated below) in the jurisdictions in which you've been issued a patent. Often, that's just the US. If you file under the PCT (Patent Cooperation Treaty), you can apply for patents simultaneously in over 100 countries, but in general, each country does a separate examination. It's complicated. Bottom line is a US Patent doesn't give you anything in Canada, let alone Europe, Asia or anywhere else.
Third, "universal" seems to suggest you can do anything. You can't. Your patent, if issued, is different from other patents. They are protected IP, too. So if you wish to include any art described in other patents, then you need to negotiate a license to be able to use that IP. Otherwise, it's you who is infringing.
最近の質問
I sometimes see questions on forums like Quora about how to stop people stealing your invention i...
4 5386 2I am looking for useful sources on protecting copyright. I am in the process of writing a book ba...
3 6115 2What is the current wisdom on compiling news feeds on a third party website so far as copyright i...
1 3962 0This might be a silly question but I’m a bit confused by ‘prior disclosure’ as it applies to pate...
2 4823 1